The Show
This Week in Science (TWIS) is a weekly, hour-long web and radio show presenting an humorous, often opinionated, and irreverent look at the week in science and technology. In each episode, TWIS discusses the latest in cutting-edge science news on topics such as genetic engineering, stem cells, cybernetics, epigenetics, space exploration, neuroscience, microbiology, the end of the world, and a show favorite – Countdown to World Robot Domination.
TWIS broadcasts weekly at 8:00pm Pacific Time on Wednesdays in live streaming video from Google+ Hangouts On-Air, YouTube, and our live broadcast page. TWIS audio is rebroadcast from KDVS, 90.3 FM in Davis, CA.
TWIS is available for download as an audio mp3 using our RSS feed. Past video episodes are also available on our YouTube Channel.
Contact us if you are interested in discussing advertising, product promotions or giveaways, sponsoring TWIS, or would like to syndicate our radio broadcast. We will be happy to provide you with our media kit.
Access our tearsheet here.
The Hosts
Dr. Kiki (Kirsten Sanford, PhD)
Before coming to Earth, Kirsten was stuck in a dead-end job as a space medic in charge of routine bloodwork in a M*A*S*H unit during the Clone Wars. With most of her hours spent doing midi-chlorian counts of sick and injured Jedi, the work quickly became boring for an active scientific mind like Kirsten’s. Nothing is more annoying than a Knight of the Force who can’t stop whining, and hearing nothing but that day in and day out, she just up and quit one day after reading a want-ad put out by the ICCX looking for scientists to be sent to Earth. Once on the job, Kirsten skillfully nosedived her AstroPod deep in some thick jungles near the planet’s equator. She named the region Burma, in memory of her beloved pet space monkey that she was forced to leave behind on her homeworld. Initially mistaking elephants for the dominant sentient species of Earth, Kirsten spent several hundred years before realizing that it was humans she was meant to study. Once that minor error was rectified, however, she wasted little time and soon was hired as chief brain surgeon to the King of Siam, under whose patronage she was able to catalog the entire extant taxonomy of Southeast Asia’s bacterial phyla (a great many centuries later, the events of this period in Kirsten’s earthly tenure would inspire the musical “The King and I” starring Yul Brynner). In time, her scientific research led her to roam the world. She walked the steppes of ancient Russia, inadvertently inventing Tartar sauce, and at length arrived in Europe toward the end of the Dark Ages. Here she documented flora and fauna, instructed local healers on the use of vitamin C in treating the Black Death, and compiled many handwritten herbals, parchment documents penned in her flowery native alien script. Some of these can still be found in rare bookshops today; the inscrutable “Voynich Manuscript” is an example of Kirsten’s early biological fieldwork on this planet. Kirsten helped bring the life sciences into the modern age when, in the mid-19th Century, she took work as a pest controller in the pea garden of an Augustinian monastery in Moravia. Here she helped a monk named Gregor Mendel develop his theories of trait heredity that would eventually grow into the science of genetics. Using her special powers, Kirsten then was able to command a flock of African swallows to carry her to the Americas, setting her down in California’s fertile central valley. Pursuing her work with birds, Kirsten enrolled in a major human research institution and studied the effects of hormones on memory formation in zebra finches. During a hiatus from school, she found work in a prominent San Francisco research hospital working on scientific experiments in which willing human test subjects were given large doses of recreational drugs. Kirsten returned to school to finish her doctorate program in Neurophysiology, enjoying a special brand of masochism by choosing do both her undergrad as well as graduate work at the University of California at Davis. Apparently she loves the smell of cow poop in the morning. It smells like victory.
Kirsten’s Science: Neuroscience and Cognition; Life Sciences
Special Power: Able to cause cellular senescence with a stern look; can speak with the birds
Homeworld: Alderaan
Justin Jackson
An anarchistic utilitarian mystic by birth, he converted to extroverted existentialism around the age of four. By age seven he had founded “The Institute of Reason”, a common sense think tank of like minded seven year olds working to improve the world they had inherited, over which he presided as Director until an unfortunate oversight in the bylaws of the institute forced him to resign on the eve of his eighth birthday. On the walls of Justin’s office hang several PHD diplomas from top U.S. universities, including (Yale, Harvard, Stanford and UC Davis). None of them bare his name, a fact that, when confronted with, is defended by him countering “Want a drink?.” Or the possibly more sinister… “They’re just trophies. (followed by a maniacal laugh)” A self-described delusional and gift to all womankind, Justin has little tolerance for the delusional behavior of others, as is evident in his ongoing attempts to lobby members of congress to have himself installed as the nations first Religion Czar. When first approached by Kirsten to be a minion co-host of TWIS, he believed her to be a figment of his imagination, and so agreed to do the show. Feeling the stings of Kirsten’s wrath after not showing up to the first show, he began to take his imagination more seriously.
Favorite Scientist: Nikola Tesla
Vision: excellent at 20/10
Best word used to describe: Candid
Education: All older women that knew what they wanted and how to teach it.
Blair Bazdarich
Blair Bazdarich is an odd mix of brilliant intelligence, mutant ability and nightmare fuel all rolled into one power-packed package. She was raised in a variety of wilderness settings across Africa, Eurasia, and California, where she learned to fight off rampaging attacks from pandas as squirrels, respectively. Though the panda “attacks” were easily defeated since pandas are inherently lazy, she retains a deep resentment towards both species to this day.
Once she settled her wandering ways, she enrolled in Charles Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters and discovered she possessed powerful superhuman mutant abilities. By performing the dance of the peacock spider, she can incapacitate foes via hypnosis, or imbue allies with amazing science trivia facts, at her whim. Of course the science facts she prefers are often horrific enough to scare off her allies as well, but nobody ever said science is always pretty.
She used these abilities all over the world, from the San Francisco Zoo to Jerusalem to the Aquarium of the Bay, but it wasn’t enough. She turned her gaze upon the Internet, where she can now be found casting a spell over fans of This Week in Science.
There is a problem with your iTunes podcast feed where I’ve subscribed. i didn’t get the last episode and there is an error in iTunes saying that the URL of the feed is bad.
Here’s the underlying URL copied from iTunes.
http://feeds.twis.org/twis/science/
Sure enough, that feed doesn’t exist when trying to access it directly.
Did you guys change your feeds around?
I notice when I go to the RSS icon the main page it shows it using an IP address rather than a FQDN (http://67.222.3.122/feed/)
Think you might want to have someone take a look at this.
Thanks!
What is the time for the live cast on twit? I thought it used to be at 8pm PST on mondays, but that does not seem to be the case anymore…
Nice lil’ site design you got here. One question though: what is the email address to contact you? 🙁
Nice website & love your show (well podcast for me). Got a request for the show – would love an update on the large hadron collider, and any new thoughts on Toxoplasma Gondii the wild Iberian Lynx seems like the most recent victim http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100406074641.htm
Cheers, J
Very cool suspended animation paper from Mark Roth. A little dated. I am a somewhat regular listener on Android via Google Listen and didn’t here this one. I plan to donate as soon as I leave the state of poverty but the bus to take me away has still missing a few wheels.
Keep up the good work!
http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/content/abstract/E09-07-0614v1
Enjoy the show!
Found this on New Scientist…
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727721.200-rethinking-einstein-the-end-of-spacetime.html?full=true
I am a French teacher who lusts for science. I wanted to be a genetic engineer when I was in high school, but the counselor told me that my math skills were too poor. Now, I wish that I had had a teacher who could have reached my inner math skills and unlocked the science goddess within me. To make up for that disappointment, I proceeded to learn 4 languages besides English. I am a linguist at heart and I see the amazing scientific comparisons: hypothesis, patterns, combinations, etc. I have posted many science-y articles around my room. I use chemical names, theories, and video podcasts to impress on my students (mostly female, it’s French class..) to explore that inquisitive tic that I know many of them have. Our school hosts an amazing “Science Night” every year. It’s not a typical science fair, but rather a way for our students to demonstrate to the community how science applies to all of us. We invite the elementary and middle school students and try to get them interested in continuing science at higher levels. All of this in a traditionally lower econo-socio status rated school. I am the only language teacher who participates and I know the students love seeing me there. They make the connection that when I say I love science, I mean it.
All of this to say to doctor Kiki, “Thank you for being a strong female in the science media world.” I mention you often and invite the students to look up your bio and podcasts.
On a side note: Please help your intern to moderate her High Raising Terminal or upspeak (raising the intonation at the end of a declarative statement) when she presents. She sounds fairly young and could benefit from a few oratory tips on effective delivery. I believe that this tick gives the impression that she is not sure or confident about her topic. As she matures as a presenter, she will find her voice more persuasive.
Appreciate your work and dedication to your listeners.
Catherine
Hi from the UK, I love the show and have been listening to the podcasts for a long time now. I’ve always meant to make a donation but never seemed to get round to it. Anyhow, I’ve donated now, so come on listeners, don’t just listen, donate! I will make more donations in the future, I promise.
I have a question:
If time travels at a different rate in space for satellites in orbit around the planet than it does for us down on the planet’s surface – why don’t satellites and astronauts disappear? I mean, how far out of sync do you have to get to disappear?
I’m sure that Justin would have something to say on this one.
cj
Love the show and listen religiously. Maybe that is the wrong word since I’m an atheist.
I have only one complaint and that is that your opening theme song is a huge earworm for me. As a musician, I have a very good music memory and this song often plays in my head.
Personally, I don’t think you need words in your theme song. It reminds me of a bad, old television sitcom song like Gilligan’s Island or The Brady Bunch.
Just got this from a climate change denier relative of mine. Might be worth a discussion.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44024
Wow, I’m flattered that my book Dark Banquet was chosen as your “Book of the Month” for October. I admire your show and I think you’re doing a wonderful service. Unfortunately, some of the major Science Channels have strayed from science and are now only concerned with pseudoscience and sensationalism. That said, if you’d ever like to interview me about blood-feeding creatures, bats… or whatever, just drop me a line. As far as what’s going on ’round here, I’ve just submitted a YA book about the adventures of a young vampire bat. My co-author (and award-winning artist, Patricia Wynne) and I are writing it in the style of the incredibly cool mid 20th century children’s book author Holling C. Holling. I’ve also recently completed a WWII techno-thriller complete with Nazi super weapons and giant vampire bats. My co-author on that one is a NYTimes Best Selling author (who at this point will remain unnamed). Finally, I’m about halfway through my followup to Dark Banquet. This one is currently titled, “You Are What You Eat: A Natural History of Cannibalism” and it should be out in 2012. Okay, gotta get back to the Donner Party. Take care and keep up the great work. – Bill
Since you like cats (which are obviously superior creatures), you may find this article in the NY Times interesting… http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/science/12cats.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a23
Just an FYI. You say the name of the Android application at the end of your shows, and I tried to find it in the market several times and couldn’t. Finally, I went to a 3rd party site that lists all Android apps and it came up: TWIS4Droid. If you don’t type it in exactly like that in the search, it won’t come up in the market. You might want to let the listeners know that.
I just came across your show listening to your Jan 6th broadcast.
Wish I could say good things about it. . .
but it just seemed too casual and rambling and cutzie.
Then you came with that 70s Global Cooling nonsense
and I’m sorry but you folks fell right on your science reporter faces.
You mischaracterized these early studies studies and worse the reason behind it becoming a controversy.
You were correct so far as the aerosols, but you neglected to mention in a couple of those studies the authors specifically pointed out that society was swamping our atmosphere with CO2 and that this could well overwhelm any cooling effect from pollutants or long term solar trends. Why ignore that?!
Why not mention the 1959 Scientific American article by Gilbert Plass?
“Carbon Dioxide and Climate”
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=carbon-dioxide-and-climate
You neglected to point out that the Global Cooling thing is a propaganda campaign via corporate front groups like Marshall Institute, SPPI, Heartland, et al. that very deliberately distorted what those studies actually said!
A campaign that deliberately took popular magazine articles and pretended that those sensationalistic news stories represented the state of the science. And you ignored the real science going on at the time. Why?
Look at the studies back then! The majority of atmospheric research was already getting worried about anthropogenic CO2.
Shame on you…
Listened to your statement about Government investment in solar and wind energy. I hate to rain on your parade but they will not be expanded until some inventor comes up with a method of producing power at a greatly reduced price including the initial investment by the producer, and any investors that believe in his proposal of the output of his proposed plant!!! All that Government spending does is drive us deeper into debt with an increase in regulations. bureaucratic snafu and loss of most of the taxpayers money with absolutely no result.
Hi Dr. KiKi, what is the name of the song used when you do a break, sounds like something that Dire Straight does. Thanks and at JavaJimsTech we mix technology with a fine cup of brew.
Sooo nice to see you view the political turmoil in egypt as a bunch of monkies throwing rocks. guess observations like that are easy tucked away in your cozy university, take a step back to think that whatever the science these people are human beings in a horrible situation.
do you have transcriptions?
Links to episodes that have transcriptions should be found in the comments sections for each episode. The transcriptions are not currently up to date.
I listen to your podcasts in work as I work on my own on nightshift so they pass the night for me. Can I make one suggestion for what I would see as a massive improvement to the show, get rid of that Justin guy. He sounds like a retard and totally screws up the show. Disclaimer, disclaimer, disclaimer wasn’t even funny the first time round and the good morning scream is the same. The show is good, the content is interesting and it’s explained usually in a way in which ordinary mortals like myself can understand, and then the idiot jumps in making weird noises and spoiling the whole thing.
Thanks for the input James, we agree completely.
We’ve been trying to find a way to get rid of Justin for several years now.
We’ve changed show times, switched from the KDVS studio to the TWiT cottage…
He keeps tracking us down!
Kirsten has point blank fired him from the show several times, but like you say, he is retarded and refuses to get a clue.
We even tried to get the authorities involved, but there isn’t yet a law against making weird noises so…
Currently he is under threat of an extradition order to Kalimantan to face charges of having illegally photographed a sleeping Monkey Cat and for texting the photos to unsuspecting strangers… a charge of Textual Surprise is being fought by his lawyers and may be tied up in the courts for years while he remains free.
We appreciate your patience while we continue to work on a solution to this problem.
Unlike James A. Tyrrell, I like Justin – but both he and Kiki are better with each other. Alone, the show feels flat. On that note, when will there be another episode?
Unlike James A. Tyrrell, I like Justin – but both he and Kiki are better with each other. Alone, the show feels flat. On that note, when will there be another episode?
You guys should enter our Science Communications Awards.
Science Writing Award
Purpose
To promote effective science communication in print and broadcast media in order to improve the general public’s appreciation of physics, astronomy, and allied science fields.
http://www.aip.org/aip/writing/
I just want to let you know that your podcast crashes VLC (on win7) when it finishes playing. I use VLC to play all my podcasts and music and yours is the only MP3 which causes this issue.
I’m not certain what you can do to help, but I just wanted to let you know.
Keep the great podcasts coming!
Joel
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/04/mobile-phone-radiation-could-interact-with-human-tissues-in-a-never-before-considered-way/#more-450160
Kiki, how about asking Dr Pamela Gay (or Gaye) to be a guest. Astronomycast.com is a facinating podcast and I know your listeners would enjoy her. She is from the University of Southern Illinois, Evansville, and is professor of physics/astronomy. Please, please!
I’m not commenting about this thread, its just the first place I could find to get a message through.
Thanks
Dr. Kiki and Justin,
I reactivated my old Pay Pal account just so I could become a regular donor for TWIS. I really look forward to each new podcast. I read the above remarks and feel the few critical comments are mostly trivial. Justin has some very interesting insights that challenge orthodoxy. Kirsten’s range of information is quite impressive. The folksy tone and spirited exchanges are entertaining. Congratulations Kirsten on producing the completely unique Nano-Kai. My wife and I raised our daughter as a scientist and it has served her very well. Thank you again, Regards, Byron
Hi Guys,
Listening in from the UK and loving it. I use your shows as GCSE revision and it WORKS! Do have a question though, thought I’d post it on here because I couldn’t find an email address anywhere.
I have been set homework to answer the question “Why is the Inner Core solid and the outer core a liquid” but we have to not use the internet, I thought by posting it here I could get help from people.
Thanks any help would be appreciated.
Thank you, Byron. We really appreciate your support, and are glad that you enjoy the mix that we put together. Yay for science babies! 🙂
Isn’t asking here technically considered “using the internet”? 😉 Think about pressure in figuring out the answer to your teacher’s question…
just found your podcast, and while i love the content, i’m sad to say, i am unsubscribing. reason? justin jackson. i don’t think he adds anything to the show, his voice is absolutely grating and there is no chemistry between dr. kiki and justin. dr. kiki overpowers justing intellectually, which makes it a poor listen. just thought you should know.
Supa-hella Massive Black Holes!
I live in London (but from Sacramento) and listen to your podcast religiously…
Thanks for the ‘hella’ shout – reminded me of home. when I complete my medical degree I would be happy to discuss some health related topics with you; especially the politics of socialised medicine, as I am a fortunate recipient of NHS care.
Keep up the good and humourous work!
Russell (soon to be Dr. Russell)
I wanted to share this story about about stinky socks and malaria.
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Stinky+socks+could+eradicate+malaria/5094192/story.html
Hey, I just wanted to say thank you! I’m a poor college kid so I can’t exactly donate but I think you guys are awesome! I’m studying Geoscience in college and one of the major issues I see is that scientific knowledge tends to be restricted to its respective experts. Not only is the knowledge not readily available, it is often saturated with indigestible terms and acronyms 🙁 . I believe most everyone has an inner scientist within them and that is a preciously beautiful thing. Thank you for helping make science something everyone can be astounded by (not just the scientists).
P.S. I used to think Justin was annoying, but he really grows on you! Hahahaha
Keep on rockin it guys!
You guys should make a little forum. I’d troll it.
and Joe C can suck it…Justin is as important to this show as Dr. Kiki….If Justin leaves, I am Boycotting, hehe.
Also, I second the idea to ask Fraser or Pamela from Astronomy Cast on the show…although they are probably ridiculously busy…It would make some good radio.
last thing, I thought this video has some really interesting science in it…http://bit.ly/eF1rCM
Keep up the awesome work! Makes my job tolerable 🙂
Also, don’t mind all the haters. Justin is awesome!
Have ye ever read or faced a blinkdog in Dungeons & Dragons (Or in AD&D), it gets dodge bonus by blinking out of way (Its mortal enemy is displacer beast)
Thought Kirstin and Justin would be interested in my blog on taking control of Japanese toilets!
Recent budget cuts seem to be hurting science. At the national level, there are major cuts in NSF, NASA, and other groups. In North Carolina we have seen outreach programs for high school and middle schools eliminated. Teaching incentives for teacher prep cut. Now they are looking to merge small challenging departments like geology and physics. This is not how others nations, like China treat science. We need to speak out now before this epidemic gets too big. Please help save the several hundred bachelor’s degree granting physics departments.
http://www.change.org/petitions/save-the-uncw-physics-department
I tried to send a donation via Paypal, and it said “This payment cannot be completed and your account has not been charged. Please contact your merchant for more information.”
Suggest you provide an alternative donation payment mechanism aside from the grossly painful to use Paypal (eg 2checkout.com or similar)
why are you always speaking about something bolivian spam??? i do not really get your point my friend…
Even medical pot can make people sound retarded.
where can I find the music your listeners send to you? i havent been able to listen lately but a currect hit on the charts, sounds very much like one of the songs you used to play. could be a listener that made it big in the music world. Is there any way to listen to the catalog of songs you use to give away with large donations?
I just finish listening to the audio book “This is Your Brain on Music” by Daniel J. Levitin. I would like to listen to an interview with him.
On a different note sometimes I want to just slap Justin and tell him to sit down and behave. I think Dr. Kiki would like to slap the little brat too. I am also aware he adds that “je ne sais qua.” He forces you to think outside the box, all the way into another dimension. I love the disclaimers. It is a show that my non-science friends can listen to and enjoy. Dr Kiki makes science attractive and Justin makes science funny.
Denis
Greetings,
Still glad you are keeping us informed about science. Science is pretty great, and it’s great to know about it. You keep it interesting to learn about science every week. I started listening in 2002 maybe 2003. but one of the first things I did was listen to 2 or 3 archived episodes per day until I listened to all that were in the KDVS archive. Going back to one a week was hard .. here.
It was a big change when Justin came along, but he grows on you .. like a fungus of science information, and now it I know it wouldn’t be the same show without him. I have even used the Forums once or twice, a rare thing for me (I don’t normal think the internet needs my input) but I love science and enjoy trading opinions with other science geeks like myself. I don’t see any way to easily find Forums on this site. Are there forums any more? We can comment on Episodes, (if they don’t disappear … wink,wink, nudge,nudge) but I don’t see anything like the old KDVS subject based forums.
If they aren’t here then they might be a great addition to the site. If they are around an easy link from the main page would be awesome.
Keep up the great work and thanks for all the sciencey goodness.
You have read it .. you can’t un-read it … Rogue Thinker
http://www.medindia.net/news/New-Arthritis-Drugs-Possible-Via-New-Gene-Discovery-91607-1.htm
Found this referencing the Opportunity rover and its collection of images on youtube.. worth a mention i would say.. Almost like a time lapse video:
http://tech-stew.com/post/2011/11/08/Mars-Rover-Eye-View-of-Opportunitys-3-year-journey-on-Mars-(Video).aspx
Who does the music for the show? I’ve been trying to find it all morning.
“Water Bear”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlGZalFIVrE
This might be a good twist on out of body experience for twis. Thanks for the show each week.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/10/31/man-with-schizophrenia-has-out-of-body-experience-in-lab-gains-knowledge-controls-his-psychosis/
I have been enjoying your podcasts in India for the past several months using stitcher radio on my iphone. To my surprise, today, I was informed by “stitcher” that these podcasts are no longer available ! Are you off permanently or is this a temporary phase ?
I have been enjoying your podcasts of TWIS in India for the past several months using stitcher radio on my iphone. To my surprise, today, I was informed by “stitcher” that these podcasts are no longer available ! Are you off permanently or is this a temporary phase ?
We are still on. I don’t know why Stitcher would no longer carry our podcast. Thanks for the note!
TWIS!
I’m not a big deal, but I wanted to let you know that I have included your podcast in my top 10 podcasts of 2011. I really enjoy your podcast, and if I was more of a scientific person, you probably would have been a higher number. My website used to be bigger, but the server crashed and I am just now recovering. The list is at http://www.davidj.org/top.ten.podcasts.2011.html
Anyway, congratulations and keep up the good work!
David Johnson
http://www.davidj.org/
Justin – you will find this interesting (regarding the idea that energy efficiency leads to more energy consumption).
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/01/12/403005/energy-efficiency-lives-debunking-rebound-effect-and-breakthrough-institute/
– Faithful listener – McSchane
About the Monte Hall problem that was discussed in tonight’s TWIS, I’ve seen this discussed several times in Scientific American and some others science sources. I’ve always come to the conclusion that it is a 50/50 chance when you get to the point of making the final choice. Here’s why.
There are always three different prizes: a car, a middle prize (such as a TV), and a goat. I believe it was described on the show as two goats, but I’ve never seen it that way before; so, I think that was just stated wrong. If Monte has a goat, he always shows the goat first. That’s the important part. If he does not show a goat, he shows the TV, never the car. So, if Monte shows the TV, the player always trades; because, that means the player has the goat and Monte only has the car left. The player wins the car every time.
The player does not even start out with a 1/3 chance, because he/she already knows what happens if Monte first shows a TV. That possibility has already been dealt with. After that, all that is left is a 50/50 chance (the car or the goat).
So, If Monte first shows a goat, then the only two items left are the car and the TV. At this point, it becomes a 50/50 chance.
Drawing a chart shows this to be true. I’ll copy/paste my chart for you, but I don’t know if the software will keep the formatting. You may need to put it back into a table to see it clearly.
Player: car tv goat
Monte: tv goat car
goat car tv
Monte shows: goat goat tv
Player’s decision: 50/50 chance 50/50 chance 100 % trade
I’ve always read that the chances improve by trading because Monte has specific knowledge that the player does not have. However, that’s only part of the story. The player also has specific knowledge about what happens if Monte first shows the TV; he only shows the TV if the player has the goat. In order to make the trade always be the best choice, the rules of the game would need to be changed so that Monte can show whatever he wants the first time. However, he can’t do that, because in one of the three arrangements, he doesn’t have a goat to show. He can’t show the car first because that would ruin the game.
I was unfortunately right about the formatting. If you slide the line that starts with, “goat,” over one tab, I think you can see how everything should line up in a table.
I forgot to mention before that if the game is played so that Monte always shows the TV, rather than the goat, the analysis is exactly the same. The two items just switch places.
Your show is awesome! Don’t ever stop!
~jan 12, Justin joked that we might discover that we are actually made of antimater. I don’t know whether I think there’s a chance in hell this is possible. however, I think it was Edison that thought the electron was positive.
Hey guys great show, keep up the great work.
Here is a new topic to discuss on the show if you haven’t already heard (ancient humans using fire to cook?):
http://www.tech-stew.com/post/2012/04/03/Did-our-ancient-ancestors-cook-1-million-years-ago.aspx
I still remember the first time I heard this podcast 5 years ago on the episode where Justin did his famous DISCLAIMER! about the equivalence of the NASA budget to how many coins you can stack to the moon and the blasting intro from High School Robot. I was just blown away that night sitting on a bus stop, waiting for a bus that comes only every two hours. I became a fan after that. I was a 27 year old, low-waged data-entry clerk without a college education and I’ve been unsure of what to do with my life over the past decade. It’s not until I listened to science podcasts like TWIS and TWIV that I began to reevaluate what I want in life. Your podcasts jump started me into going back to college to get an Associate in Arts for Teaching Secondary (Biology) for High School or Middle School. Your engaging and insightful conversations gave me something worthwhile to strive for where otherwise I was a little lost. Thank your Dr.Kiki and Justin for giving me a path that I can believe in and be proud of in life.
Will continue to listen down here in Miami.
thank you so much for sharing that!
*tears*
and with that, you just gave me a path I can believe in and be proud of in life too
Justin, are you still selling your novel?
can you enable subscribing to your show via google reader? many of the other twit shows allow this. it would be handy. keep up the great show!
That sounds like a great idea. How do I do it?
good question! Justin… if you are, we should put a link to it on this site to make it easy for people to find.
Each week I find myself scratching my head and wondering why this show isn’t grant funded and syndicated on public broadcasting (in addition to the TWiT podcast, of course)!
The chemistry is great. The tone is fun, smart, and enthusiastic. The topics are timely and interesting. I think it may be two factors that inhibit crossover to wider awareness and adoption:
1) The ad hoc conversation is not a format to which “big media” or the traditional media consumer is accustomed.
2) The conversation tends toward the technical or theoretical. Viewers have to be deeply engaged in order to discover the personal relevance of the topics.
A suggestion:
1) Record the show as two separate half-hour segments, with bumps on the ends. (Allows for more sponsorship and program scheduling options.)
2) Invite subject matter experts to submit brief video clips (20-60 seconds) explaining the relevance of each story (how it might affect the life of the viewer) and insert these clips after each story.
For instance, Neil Degrasse Tyson might explain why a new observation of dark matter might impact our mastery of physics. Steven Novella might explain how a neurological study could lead to a breakthrough drug or suggest a potential new therapy. Etc.
These “guest testimonials” would provide quick punches of obvious relevance, break-up the ad hoc conversation with traditional narrative, add dynamic content to the show, and possibly engage some “star power,” all of which might make grant providers, sponsors, media broadcasters and casual science enthusiasts perk up their ears a bit.
You would need a network of potential guests, who could provide a brief response the day prior to the show. (Justin, you would need to prepare your stories in advance. Sorry!) These wouldn’t need to be interviews. Guests could send self-recorded video or “Skype-in” to TWiT for a quick recording session.
Now, I’m rambling. Anyway. All this to say I love the ‘cast, look forward to it each week, and want an ever wider audience to enjoy it as much as do I!
New High Court Ruling in Australia, stated that the federal School Chaplaincy funding ruled unconstitutional. But unfortunately not due to the blatantly obvious conflict between church and state. It isecause legislation is not appropriate.
Thought you might like this.
New High Court Ruling in Australia, stated that the federal School Chaplaincy funding ruled unconstitutional. But unfortunately not due to the blatantly obvious conflict between church and state. It is because legislation is not appropriate.
Hi, thanks for the awesome show, I look forward to it every week.
Do you mail World Robot Domination t-shirts to the UK?
I hope you do, I really want one.
Keep up the sciency awesomeness!!
cj
I must echo the remarks from Brian (5-23-12 entry). You have a unique style and great interpersonal chemistry. I especially enjoy the debunking services you offer.
I must echo the remarks from Brian (5-23-12 entry). You have a unique style and great interpersonal chemistry. I especially enjoy the debunking services you offer.
I would benefit from a chat room tutorial so I can read the ongoing conversation wehn I view the videos from Youtube. During TWIS maggeddon I could see remarks but could not find a place on my screen to contribute.
I just reinstated a $10/ month payment and a separate $210 contribution to express my appreciation for theheroic 21 hour extravaganza.
On a significant note, when can we expect to see Blair’s riveting Spider dance again?
Best REgards, Byron Lee
The February 14, 2013 show.
I have been listening to the show for several years, at least since 2009. I think longer.
While I certainly like that you all enjoy and can have fun with the science topics I find the immaturity level of Blair to be darn near intolerable.
Here is a person that is suppose to be dedicating their life to science and disseminating the latest information about science to the general public yet she giggles and guffaws when ever something about sex is the topic. It really sounds like a junior high student doing a oral report on human reproduction.
This is actually my second comment about Blair. One was while she was an intern several years back and now this one. I am not sure who is the one making the decision about keeping her on the show or what the selection process was but I would highly recommend someone that was better able to communicate.
Justin and Dr. Kiki form a good team. While Blair has much to contribute it is a high price to pay for her childish laughter.
I will admit that she is significantly better at speaking than she was when she started.
Hi Thomas. Thank you for listening to TWIS for so long, and for your candor.
I respectfully do not agree with your assessment of Blair. I find lots of humor in topics related to sex, and many times laugh and make jokes myself. A significant part of this show is about finding the humor in science, and making it more relate-able. I think Blair brings wonderful insight to this show, and has been a valuable addition to our team. Whether or not you like her laugh is not something I’m particularly concerned with.
That said, I will take your comment into consideration as we report on sensitive topics in the future. We do reach a lot of people, and we really should think about what we say before we say it.
Hi,
I’ve listened to your show for a few years, and its been a refreshing look at Science – still is. I drive long distances and your show keeps me company….
Discovered recently that the Podcasts download to iTunes isn’t working. Last podcast is Feb 28.
Are you no longer on the iTunes auto-upload system? If so, how do I access your latest podcasts?
Thanks again for a great show,
/andy
Podcasts are coming out slowly. The only two people who are able to are Dr Kiki, who as we all know is quite busy (and she just moved, and has been in the process of the move for the past few months), and myself (I have no excuse, just a little busy and a bit lazy).
Hey, did you guys hear about the Glowing Plants project? First Syn-Bio Kickstarter funded within 2 days!
http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/23/glowing-plants/
Firstly. Blair is great, leave her alone Thomas!
Secondly, my real reason for writing here, in this week’s show (413) you discussed how early man might’ve got to Indonesian islands. You stated that it wouldn’t be possible to see the islands from elsewhere because of the distances involved (16 miles or so). Well the distance from England to France, across the Straits of Dover, is about 20 miles and, on a clear day it is possible to see France from England. So maybe the ancient peoples did make boats and paddle across to land that they saw?
I enjoy almost everything about the podcast, but more and more I am finding I am more disappointed then anything. I get that you are trying to make an entertaining podcast with humor, opinions, and some irreverence. I get this, and encourage it. Even when the opinions expressed are not shared by me, I recognize that the hosts are the ones putting themselves out there and that gives them the ability to express opinions.
What I am disappointed at is the lack of use of the scientific methods in your own discussions. For example in the March 28th you spoke of
* Healthier Fruit Flies — (great story, thanks for giving it some light), but no one mentioned the fact that to Fruit, a Fruit-Fly is a “PEST”. Hence fruit that has been grown ‘organically’ will be more susceptible to pests. This does not take away from this cool story, but it is an example among many of how the hosts could have stepped back from their opinions for organic.
* Fish For Fuel — Kiki, you did try to point out that the use of this organism as defined would not interfere with their continued natural existence. Far too much unnecessary and miss-informed opinion time given here. What are their environmental needs? How fast do they reproduce? How would we need to contain them to assure they don’t get into our environment where they shouldn’t be?
* Men vs Women — Lots of theories that this is nurture vs nature – boys brought up with goal oriented play (sports, cops/robbers, building), girls brought up to socialize and consensus build (dolls, crafts). Then there is discussion about colors pink (drunk-tank-pink) vs blue. Then, while you normally encourage new and crazy ideas, you totally shutdown Justin on his (silly and nutball) idea, ok likely that was right action.
* bacterial diet – Wouldn’t the fact that you are eating less food mean that there would be less surplus energy for the bacteria? Thus the bacteria collection would change. It is good to know that it changes in favor of weight loss. I was intrigued by the change in diet desires.
It seemed in early days, the stories would be picked apart from the science they imply or enable. Now days it seems the stories are just a jumping place for some personal agenda opinion. Kiki, I can tell you are trying. I appreciate every effort.
John
This show is great. I’ve been listening for 5 years. Thank you so much for doing all the work to pick through the research and make it conversational. I love this show! I love your personalities, too! I’m glad Blair stuck around.
Don’t let people’s personal politics (*coughJohncough*) make you pull your punches. You do pretty well in toning down the controversial political talk when it gets out of hand. Good points, though, John – I was yelling some of the same things while I was listening to it…
This should would be worthless if you didn’t bring your personal takes on the stories with the info.
I have disagreed, too, but we’re different people – that is par for the course. 🙂
Science!!!
Love the show. Long time listener (iTunes)
Just can’t seem to understand why they cant improve their audio?
Their latest guest sounded perfect ..yet Kirsten sounded like she was muffled and talking from a tin clad bathroom..
Sorry Stefen. It all depends on the tech. We no longer broadcast from a radio studio, but rely upon the web. That particular interview show I was joining in from a hotel room in Virginia with a really old laptop and usb headset. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t.
PS to Thomas Trues March 15th comment about Blair: I think Blair is funny. I’m 60 years old and if there is one thing I’ve learned in those 60 years it’s that sex is ridiculously funny! (and fun).
Dear twis,
I have a problem. When a new twis podcasts shows up I immediately stop what I am listening to and start your show… but then I have this long long wait till the next week for the next show. To tie me over and others in my situation, can you tell us what podcasts are in your podcatcher?
Help! My husband does not believe in Global warming. He has read the ICCP (Oct. 2013) 85 page paper and states the data points on the grafting of the global temperature are inconsistent. The temperatures predicted are outside the 90% statistical range. He says its too off the mark. Basing theory on this data that is not statistically significant is questionable. Please give me some evidence that I can counteract his argument. I’m very frustrated and only state to him he is wrong without back up. He is a good arguer. Whatever scientific articles you can point me to would be very helpful!
Margaret,
Please send an email to blairbaz@twis.org and I will give you some resources. Don’t back down!
I’m afraid I have to scrap TWIS from my long list of science podcasts. I’ve put up with the somewhat annoying breathless, gee golly gosh tone of some of the presenters because the content is often very good. But the audio quality has become intolerable. Your recording levels seem way too high and the distortion is quite painful, even with noise canceling headphones. I hope you can find a way to improve the sound recording. I know you don’t have access to a proper studio but there are home recording solutions that work.
They are actually working on it, first with getting Blair a microphone. If you want to help out, support them on Patreon.
This show continues to be an inspiration [& source of amusement] to my students, to me & the rest of the Science faculty at my school. Thanks so much for your efforts, diversity & lively insanity.
May your wombats run free & unfettered.
Wow! Thank you for sharing TWIS with your students and other science faculty. We do appreciate that you listen. We shall do the same and unleash our wombats 😉
Listening to your older podcasts at work. Just listened to one from a year ago. About whispering animals. Wanted to share my own experience, my pony Mare often whispers when asking for treats. She will nicker at me in such a deep and soft way unless you are right next to her and its dead quiet you will not hear it at all. You can only tell she’s talking if you’re at a distance is because her nostrils are vibrating. If she’s hungry she will yell and deffen you.
Justin: PLEASE stop interrupting Blair and Kirsten with mansplaining rants. Please also stop ranting in a non-scientific way on a science podcast. This is the primary reason I listen to TWIS only intermittently. Certain episodes are just too much Justin Rant and Justin Interrupting The Science With Rant for me to finish. It seems as though Justin interrupts Blair in particular (maybe because she was the intern before?). For example, Episode 485, where he flatly contradicts Blair in her area of expertise (I’m thinking about the wolf hunting v. wild dog hunting thing) set my teeth on edge.
I’m all for self-taught experts putting their knowledge out there, and I enjoy the tone that Linda above doesn’t seem to care for. I especially appreciate that the credentialed scientists on the show are both women, since the lack of women in STEM fields is problematic. But for crying out loud, whatever Justin needs to do to wait his turn to talk, please implement that.
Ugh. I just was listening to july 27th, 2014 episode, and stupid sexist throwaway jokes about broads? when the broad institute is mentioned? Comments like this are a waste of my time. Painful to listen to. Taking the whole podcast off my playlist. I sign up for a science podcast for intelligence, not for inanity.
Ugh. Comments like yours are a waste of our time because they really do nothing to help us improve the show. Are you just trying to make us feel bad for making a joke, no matter how inane it might have been? Sorry that we aren’t highbrow enough for your tastes. There are plenty more science podcasts out there that you might enjoy. Obviously, you aren’t our target audience.
However, if you think any of your friends might like our toilet humor, let them know about TWIS! Oh, wait… do you have any friends?
Hi
you were doing an episode about Circumcision.
why don’t you ever talk about how the foreskin is the sexual sensor .it is like cutting away you tongue/tastebuds
It’s too bad Justin is such a blind patriot. I LOVE science. And the other 2 hosts. But I seriously can’t stand misinformation from a self proclaimed mystic. His ‘chilled zany’ persona doesn’t cover up his lack of journalism ability; it annoys. And when his inaccurate ‘reporting’ is wrong, it makes him look stupid. I’m not a fanatic. And I had high hopes for this show. But it is now officially off my subscribe list, and won’t be recommended.
Sorry you feel that way, Darren. Unfortunately, we can’t please everyone. Hope you find lots of science out there.
I enjoy the show, but Justin is incredibly difficult for me to listen to. The man needs some serious public speaking training and should learn some basic etiquette. He’s constantly interrupting others (including special guests) mid-sentence and will constantly speak over them until they are forced to stop, just to get his point across. I’m sure I’m not the only one that’s continuously hitting the fast-forward button whenever he comes on.
That said, the other 2/3 of the show is great. Keep up the good work, and I hope you find something for Justin that he’d be better at. Maybe then, I could start recommending the show to others!
Thank you for your comments. We do take every criticism to heart.
*An Anomaly That Can Shake One`s Skepticism to the Core*
>Women give birth on time acc. to Benford`s Law, – Law of All Digits, E8, STRINGOTYPE<
I have done big data birth analyses and found Benford`s law and it`s underlaying
algebra for populations with peculiar significant results. This suggest some kind of order.
Please see http://www.stringotype.com
If you have any comments on this, I would really appreciate to hear from
you.
Best regards,
Terje Dønvold
I just learned about your podcast and listened to the last 2 recent ones. Also after reading other comments, you really need to drop the guy from the show. Its an audible medium and his his voice and grammar are awful. I find myself FF thru the show when he speaks. Its a shame cuz the women are awesome. Fun to listen to, easy to understand, very clear and educational. They dont stammer or stumble over other people. I hope i find another great science podcast like yours minus the guy. Drop him and watch your ratings soar !!
I just learned about your podcast and listened to the last 2 recent ones. Also after reading other comments, you really need to drop the guy from the show. Its an audible medium and his his voice and grammar are awful. I find myself FF
What’s FF?
And, there are many who enjoy his presence on the show. I think he has a great voice. People are more likely to post negative comments than positive. But, we do appreciate any and all constructive criticism. Thanks for listening, and commenting!
Great podcast! We need teams like you in the science field that make important research work possible to understand by folks who are not in the field. I have a PhD myself in mechanical engineering and materials science and am a university professor. I read several journal articles in fields related to mine on the weekly basis, but I still learn lots of new things every time I listen to your show. It’s like getting a synopsis of what has been going on this past week in fields I have no to little knowledge in. It’s great! . I listen to your podcast everyday ( to catch up on some old episodes) on my drive to work; it starts my day right!
I quite enjoy the three different styles of the hosts’ approach to explaining what they know/learn to the general audience. It’s for sure a great approach. I “tackle” this in the classrooms on a daily basis so I know how hard it is to make everyone like and accept how you explain things. Wait, it’s not hard, it’s impossible. 🙂
Keep up the great work, guys!
Hello,
I agree that science could be fun. But, what is sireaucly (not fun), should not be fun.
Meanwile, nice CV.
Irena Nesic, Master of science, chemist
Thank you for listening to the show!We are so glad that you enjoy it.
YES!!! I first came across your show sometime between 2005 and 2007, when I was working in a paleoecology lab. Cool stuff, but prepping ancient bits of plants for isotope and radiocarbon analysis was not the most mentally stimulating way to spend one’s day. Enter your podcast, which was so refreshing, educational, and fun! At an hour long, it also helped fill up my day!
Fast-forward maybe 8 years later, and I find myself analyzing thousands of bat calls, which is fantastic but mindless work. I remembered your show, but couldn’t remember what you were called (a brain injury I sustained last year didn’t help) and assumed you had long ago abandoned the airwaves for other pursuits. A short Google search later, and imagine my surprise and glee to find you again!!! I am halfway through your Nov 11 episode, and am SO happy to hear the great stories and fun banter of Kirsten, Justin, and now Blair (as a wildlife biologist, I am really digging her section) again. Bliss.
Thank you, thank you, thank you! Oh, and after reading some negative reviews of Justin on here I have to provide a positive one to help counterbalance them. I love Justin’s voice and humor, and he is brilliant. No offence to Kirsten, who is equally wonderful, but he was the main ‘memorable’ component of the show for me, and I’m SO glad to see you are still at it together, all these years later.
Keep on, keepin’ on!
So glad you found us again, and that we can continue to provide you entertainment during your hours of work. (And, no offense taken… I think Justin is great, too)
I love it when you cover pseudo sciences. I think it’s a real treat for the imagination. Thanks Justin for covering some of these topics. Because others are to scared to. You do it well by adding mysticism and energy when bringing the new discoveries to your listeners. You have a voice like Jay Baruchel which is unique and totally cute. The only difference is that you’ve got the brains to back up that nerdy voice.
It’s easier for me to stream your shows on my phone through “soundcloud” so can I get some recent shows uploaded. Thanks
I use Stitcher Radio to listen to you guys. I listen to podcasts around 8-9 hours a day and thought provoking podcasts are the best. I get lost in thought branching off of the topics you guys talk about. I love it when you talk about particle physics. Your songs crack me up and i really enjoy the silly jokes and laughing. One of the reasons i got hooked is because of the personality of you girls. Justin is awesome too, i like how he thinks about stuff. It would be cool to write him about some of the things he talks about on the show because you get this weird sense of comradery while learning with you guys. I’m definitely a promoter of the show, forcing people to listen to you on the factory floor of the auto plant i work at lol. I listened to you on TWIT the other day Kristen, was one of my favorite episodes of their show. I was thrilled to see you there. You brought out this part of Leo i didnt know existed lol, he can actually talk scientifically with you! Anyway…. Good job.
Wow! Thank you so much. It is really wonderful to hear your thoughts. You should totally email Justin, but he rarely checks his TWIS email… :/
Thank you for the comments! We will work on getting the recent episodes on Soundcloud!
You three seem somewhat penguin-familiar (or penguin-obsessed), so here is my question: Emperor penguins (for example) oversee their laid eggs for about 9 weeks, never letting them spend more than a moment lying on the ice. (If the egg was to remain in contact with the ice for more than a few moments anytime throughout the 9 weeks that it is an egg, contact with the ice would kill the chick inside.)
My question is: HOW did penguins figure out over the millenia that if their egg laid directly on the ice for more than a few moments of the 9 weeks, the chick would not be born? (If the egg exploded the moment it contacted the ice I could understand how the birds could learn the cause-and-effect relationship and importance of keeping the egg off of the ice. But in this case, how does a pair of penguins manage to associate the observation “Hey, it’s been 9-1/2 weeks and a chick hasn’t come out yet; I’ll bet we’re not gonna get one this time”…with “Hey, remember back 90,720 minutes to the morning of Day #2 when we lost track of our egg and it sat directly on the ice for 2 minutes? I’ll bet that’s why we got no baby poppin’ out this week! Whatcha think, Partner, should we keep the egg off the ice more next time?”
Gary.
PS– I don’t get to listen to you each week, so if you have an answer (or guess) I would appreciate an email response to the email address I provided.
To my way of thinking, for penguins to figure out the above 9-week cause-and-effect regarding egg hatching would be like me going fishing for a very hard to catch species of fish, only to be told by the local fishermen: “We finally figured out the secrets to catching one; the rules are few and simple, but precise: 1) You have to fish for that species of fish ALL day EVERY day, whether you want to continue or not; 2) NEVER leave your fishing spot unattended (by someone); 3) NEVER lay your fishing rod down on the ground for more than 30 seconds. (If you do, you will have to start all over next year.) 4) Once you have fulfilled Rules 1, 2 and 3, the fish you wish to catch will leap out of the water into your lap on your 63rd consecutive day of fishing for it.”
Hi Gary,
Thanks so much for your question! To my understanding, it is less of a cause-and-effect, and more of an evolutionarily learned tactic. Those parents that kept contact with their eggs had babies and therefore that tactic survived to the next generation. Many parental traits that we consider “;earned” are actually hard-wired. So, it was “learned,” but over generations, not over a lifetime. You can think about it like how human parents treat their kids – there are some variants from first to second child, but when it comes down to it there are still things that they will always do the same, and similarities down family lines in family and parental style. I hope that helps!
-Blair
So… I recall someone predicted no gravitational waves will be discovered in 2016… Teehee time for a Panda suit? ????
One of my favorite podcasts! All three of you are very informative and entertaining! I just have one comment. What happened to the great songs? I loved “I am a scientist ” (actually, I’m an engineer) and used to sing it to myself all day after listening to the podcast!
This show is awesome. I used to listen to music during my morning commute, but I realized that an hour of the same songs wasn’t helping me grow in any way. There is no better way to make my morning commute feel productive (and proudly nerdy).
We still have great songs. Just maybe not the same ones you remember due to licensing restrictions. The best part about the songs we use now is that we won’t get fined or sued for playing them!
Thank you for including us in your mornings! We hope that we can help you learn and grow in nerdiness.
How can I email you guys? I’ve seen no email listed and all the email “mailto:” links are broken with nothing in the To: field.
Oh, weird! Thanks for bringing that to our attention.
You can email me at kirsten at thisweekinscience dot com.
Discovered your podcast a couple weeks ago and find it informative and entertaining, however, I don’t think that I can take the Justin character much more. He talks like the jerky guy at the bar at 1:30 am. I’ll give the show a couple more weeks and maybe I will learn to ignore it.
Thanks for giving us a listen. We hope our show becomes a part of your regular staple of podcasts.
Dr. Kiki,
I am attempting to get a hold of your accounting department to cancel my paypal donations because I am unemployed. Please have someone contact me. All I want to do is cancel the recurring charges.
Thank you,
Jennifer
Hi Jennifer, Thanks for getting in touch. I have emailed you about this issue. –kiki
Hello again! I’ve been listening to your podcast for just over a year now, and I felt the need to come back here and apologize to Justin for my previous comment. I was a bit annoyed by him at first, but after becoming a regular listener he’s changed my opinion completely. I think he brings a great value to the show (even though I disagree with him half the time), and all 3 of you have great chemistry together.
I do have a question regarding your recent interview with Josiah Zayner. He mentioned the sugar cravings he developed that his donor had always experienced, but I was curious if he experienced any changes in allergies (either positive or negative). I’ve read that peanut allergies may be influenced by gut bacteria, and other types of allergies could be related as well. I guess I could ask him directly on his Facebook page.
Still loving the show. Keep up the great work!
Thank you so much for posting! We really appreciate your honesty. AND, thank you for sticking it out. We hope you keep listening for many years to come.
We didn’t ask about allergies! That is a great question. I’ll ask him!
Episode 51 still has not arrived in my podcast feed. Worse, I have not found a reference to it on the website. HELP! Withdrawal symptoms are threatening to get the better of me.
I know! I went on vacation, and am waaaaay behind in publishing. I’m so sorry for the delay. 571 will be up in about an hour, and 572 will be close behind. Silly vacations!
Such an effort. Gargantuan in scale. With NO LISTED EPISODE CONTENT anywhere? That is really STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!!!!!!! In all…… the show deserves accolades not avaiable for this one-of-a-kind show? So where is the content list, HUH, HUH, HUH??????
Each episode is listed on our homepage, twis.org. Click on an episode to get to the show notes, which describe and link to the stories we discuss.
Not quite finished with your episode from 6/22/16.
I realize this was an interview with a person with her own beliefs and experiences, but there are just as many ethical issues than if you had interviewed a currently practicing naturalpath with the same level of criticism. I agree the “field” of naturalpathy is rife with hucksters and immoral practices, my mother in law is a naturalpath and I cringe with some of the “treatments” she suggests. First naturalpathy and homeopathy aren’t the same thing, though they are often practiced together. Second, the idea that western or “real” medicine is safe and evidence based just isn’t realistic. The over use of statins kills a LOT of people and makes many more people sick, that’s the fact, but few doctor’s read research. Compare that to ozone theopy which was claimed on the show has absolutely no evidence, and is quite the contrary. Sure it’s poo-pooed by biased doctor’s who don’t read research, but there are MANY good studies supporting its use. And the common claim by many people who are purporting to be more intelligent and able to judge science that there is “no science” is the most cringe worthy and hypocritical of all. NO science means no one could get funding to do the science, evidence against is the phrase they’re looking for, but so often is the case that the reality is the evidence isn’t clear and they just want to use their perceived intellectual authority to pressure people into their own biased opinions.
As far as safety of Western medicine and drugs, it’s not much to be praised. I’m not criticizing doctors, but the numbers on deaths from prescription medications is unconscionable. Even when excluding drug abuse, misperscription and contraindications, the fact is we’re usually shooting in the dark and a ridiculous number of people die as a result. The human body is vastly more complex a chemical reaction than we can wrap our heads around for even the best practitioners even before you mix in kickbacks, incentives, LOTS of money, political power struggles, regulations, human biases, etc.
Doctors are RARELY practicing evidence based medicine. They’re following the procedures they were taught that are often 30+ years out of date, and the ones brave enough to venture into REAL science based medicine face a scary world of liability and rebuke. You guys were also fairly biased in your opinions on this episode. The practice of modern medicine is not safe.
(though, to the people who want to go “natural” your doctor almost certainly knows more than you and probably has years of practice to make a reasonable decision, so don’t preclude that because you decided it wasn’t “natural”, you’re not smarter than your doctor)
Absolutely appreciate your comments. Thank you for listening to the episode. I think what we missed in our effort was that basic message that we should use science to determine the best methods for treating people, and naturopathy, as it stands, does not have the weight of evidence behind it that modern medicine does (yes, medicine has its faults, and is by no means perfect – both practices depend on the expertise of the practitioner). That said, you are right, there are VERY useful aspects to naturopathy that are often missed in the rush and push of hospital systems and over-crowded doctor’s offices. I think naturopathy can complement medicine, as long as naturopaths realize and are honest about their limitations.
Regarding the ozone example, ozone is a toxic molecule that can cause severe reactions and lead to death when inhaled. It is a very reactive molecule, which can be useful, BUT only in certain situations OUTSIDE of the body. Treatments such as ozone need to be regulated and used only in certain prescribed situations. Otherwise, it is dangerous quackery.
I’m a few months behind on listening to your podcasts and I was just I was just listening to the show dated 4/13/16. Well, when you got to the part about the flat earth believers certainly made my eyes roll. I have come across quite a few video of this nonsense on YouTube. For some reason it seems to be on an astronomy channel. I attempted to watch a couple I couldn’t get past four minutes as they are so stupid! So I would leave a comment under some videos. I tell you, these people are quite literally the most stupid people on the planet. Debating with them is ridiculous. They are completely irrational. Try explaining anything and they dispute it. They say science is a belief, more eye roll. I’ve asked them a number of questions about the “flat earth” and they either get no response, get a few “I don’t know” or answers that are just 100% BS. Dogs are smarter than these people. I don’t think they are capable of even understanding the use of a simple lever. Well, I guess these people are needed by society to do menial jobs as they can’t have anything more than a HS diploma. Although I don’t think some of them have gone past the 5th grade.
Came across the podcast feed by accident, looking for science podcasts. I tried a few episodes, and the show has really grown on me. At first I thought the informality was a little off-putting until I realized you were recording via Google Hang Out. At any rate, I really enjoy the science stories you three bring to the table, as most are outside my own area of research, but very fascinating. I am also impressed by the songs (the outro song struck me as a tad odd, but after reading the bios on this page, I guess it was on purpose). The only remaining mystery for me: What does Blair have against giant pandas and squirrels?
Hi Kirsten,
My name is Anuj Agarwal. I’m Founder of Feedspot.
I would like to personally congratulate you as your blog This Week in Science has been selected by our panelist as one of the Top 100 Science Blogs on the web.
http://blog.feedspot.com/science_blogs/
I personally give you a high-five and want to thank you for your contribution to this world. This is the most comprehensive list of Top 100 Science Blogs on the internet and I’m honored to have you as part of this!
Also, you have the honor of displaying the badge on your blog. Use the code to display the badge proudly on your blog.
Best,
Anuj
Hi guys! I listen to podcasts nearly all-day every-day at work, and TWIT with Leo is one of my favorites.
But I only enjoy technology, whereas I LOVE science. I want so badly to enjoy TWIS as much as I do TWIT, so I thought I would mention some constructive criticism because it is an easy fix that might help strengthen the podcast.
Of all the podcasts I listen to (including the improvised ones), TWIS has by far the most dead air time :/ . There seems to be a lot of silent pauses after someone stops talking, to the point that I often find myself thinking about the pauses and completely forget what was even said. Too many of these pauses in a row and I simply click to the next podcast.
Anyway! Love the subject matter of the podcast! Hope to see this podcast grow!
Thank you for the free content you provide me and others 🙂
Thanks for the feedback. I notice the pauses, too! And they always make my heart skip a beat. We’ll discuss a strategy for reducing them! Thanks again.
I regularly enjoy listening to your show as a podcast while driving. However I have some difficulty with the podcast audio level relative to other podcasts, system sounds on my phone, and phone’s GPS app. I have to turn up the volume for TWIS to be able to hear, yet notifications will be unbearably loud when they happen. The transition to other podcasts such as Science Friday and Planetary Radio can be shocking as well.
Thank you for anything that can be done.
Chris!
Thank you for your comment. I started processing our files for compatibility to the international radio standard of -24 LUFS (loudness units) a short while back. This does make the files generally quieter. Can you say when our podcast started getting quiet on you? Maybe that’s what is doing it. No one else has commented on our volume, so this is a VERY valuable data point. I’d love to know more because I want people to enjoy a great TWIS listening experience.
Hey,
I’ve been enjoying your show for quite a while and loved your recent episode so much. So, I just wanted to say thanks to you guys for everything you are doing here. I’m a Science enthusiast and love listening to your episodes in my spare time. Keep up the good work, and keep ’em coming.
Regards,
Cathy
Thank you for listening to TWIS, Cathy! It means a lot to hear from you that you enjoy what we do. Please, share us with your friends!
..mostly enjoy the show! I wanted to clarify something that’s bugging me. I can’t imagine your disconnect with the word “kludge”. It’s an old old word, and you defined it close enough, but it’s pronounced like judge, not like some frenchified luge…
Haha! Thank you for the clarification on pronunciation. I’m going to have such a difficult time changing how I pronounce it! I really do like my frenchified version so much better 😉
Your email address kirsten@thisweekinscience.com is bouncing. Just tried to send an email (destined for Justin, not sure if he has his own email). Thanks
Thanks, Scott! I just found out that I’m still having an issue with my email. Hopefully, I’ve gotten the smtp problem resolved finally.
Justin does have his own email, which he gives in the end credits of the show. Hope that helps!
Please remove Justin Jackson he sounds so uneducated and Ill informed
Hi Bill, while I appreciate that you might not find Justin’s presentation style appealing, he has been and will continue to be a valuable part of the show. Thank you for your comment. –kiki
Hi, I’ve mostly enjoying the show (thanks!) but there are a couple of irritating things.
First, I often feel like hearing a thinking that natural is always good and and synthetic is bad (e.g. lately with pesticides). This is not scientific thinking.
Another similarly strange view seems to be that the old situation is good and should not change (like with red v. gray squirrels). Why? From what perspective? Are you looking to return to some kind of paradise. Sorry, it does not exist.
I suggest science based thinking.
Otherwise enjoying.
Br, Hessu
Thank you for your comment, Hessu. We do apply science-based thinking, and don’t espouse the virtues of “natural” over synthetic methods unless there is data that support it. It is always important to consider what we are putting into an environment and what the effects might be. One method is not necessarily better than the other, and science is what brings us better understanding.
As per the squirrels, change is part of life, but this is an ongoing conversation we need to have regarding conservation policies. When is it better to let an invasive species enter an ecosystem than to conserve the status quo? There is a fine line that is different for every situation, and the conversation must be necessarily nuanced.
One of the facets of our show are the variety of opinions that we, the hosts, hold. While Blair is more conservative in her conservation views, Justin and I carry different opinions, which we discuss in light of stories on the show. Sometimes one view is predominant over the others, but I promise you that we have many years of scientific training behind us, and bring that to the table. That said we are human and can be swayed by emotion and personal biases, but more often than not we maintain a scientific approach to our stories.
Thank you for listening.
–kiki
Being a TWIS fan, I herewith submit my TWIStiment to the role of science in my life. Though no scientist nor having training beyond college courses, I totally rely on science as a practicing visual artist, as do all creatives whether recognized or not. Geometry, geology, mineralogy, engineering and physics et al are required to make and maintain the machinery and tools to work steel and wood, fiber, stone, paint and clay; likewise the role of chemistry and atmospherics in the mastery of pigments and finishes, all, via the artisan empower the object itself, its life expectancy and interaction with light and space. Science, like art animates the what if, spurs possibilities, teaches by mistake and demands we build upon, and with, truth.
Thank you for your comment, Walter! May I read this on the show???
I feel like y’all say this on every show, but I keep missing it… where do I send my What Has Science Done for Me Lately story?
You can message us on our Facebook page OR send me an email: kirsten at this week in science dot com.
I enjoy your podcast. I’m a PI patreon.
I think you should be aware of this guy
Acapella Science (Tim Blais):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAJsZWhj6GI
Thank you! I LOVE his stuff.
Hi! Here is my “What Has Science Done for Me…Lately?” entry:
I love dogs and I have a pack of dogs living with me and my kids. One of the wonderful things about science are all of the amazing types of medicine we have developed for our furry friends. There are vaccinations, pest control and more. Also, the fact that dogs are one species and so different from one another in size, color, furriness, etc, always blows my mind. I enjoy thinking about how they’ve been with us for so long (as scientists discovered by looking at the genetic clock) and how we’ve most likely influenced each others’ lives. Taking my dogs to the vet means that I get to spend even more quality time with my canines. 🙂
Thanks for your awesome show! I love what each of you brings and how you have unique voices and perspectives! 🙂
Thank you so much for sharing, Susan! I’ll make sure to read this on the show next week. I know the dog-lovers out there will relate.
Thank you for listening to and enjoying TWIS!
Very entertaining and informative show!
Unfortunately it is severly ruined by Justins way of talking. Sounds like some drunk party guy, slurred, upseting, inconsistent, disruptive, loud. If he could contain himself for just a notch, that would allow greater circle of people to listen to the show.
Science/nature is very interesting on its own, no need for exxageration with drunky party feel!
Thank you for your comment. We appreciate the feedback, and hope that you continue to listen to TWIS and share it with others.
Justin,
Don’t mind the haters, your presentation style is fine. I find it amusing that people take the time to be publicly negative just for the sake of being negative. Your contributions to the conversations are clear and intelligent. And the bit of humor you add is welcome. Good job to all three of you on a fine podcast.
Thank you for the positivity, and appreciating what we appreciate about Justin. And, thanks for listening!
Expressing an opinion is not necessarily “hating”. I would just echo what other people have said about Justin’s net detraction from your presentation. However, when he is presenting his items he is more professional and clear, perhaps because he is simply reciting from an article, but it is still a good presentation.
As with anything you have to take the bad with the good and the good is VERY good and I appreciate and mostly enjoy your podcast.
I just listened to your 07/17 podcasts about constants and very much appreciated the science, methodologies, and possibilities presented.
Thank you for enjoying the show. We are always trying to improve, and take all criticisms seriously. So glad you enjoyed the interview regarding constants. We had a great time with that conversation. Thank you for listening and sharing your thoughts!
Enjoyed your podcast especially the one from the future no. 765 dated 18th April 2020, can I borrow your time machine or perhaps I’ve stolen it in the future. 😀
Oh no! That one got past the time lords… oops!
I love this podcast and try to listen each week but I have to comment that lately I feel like Justin’s interruptions while others are talking has gotten so distracting and frustrating that I almost find myself needing to turn off the podcast.
@Justin- Please please work on this and let your colleagues and guest speakers finish speaking before you do.
Basics I teach my kids. ?????
Thank you for your comment, Michelle. I think at least one influence here is internet lag-time. Justin has recently been joining us through hotel wifi, which has been less than desirable. On his end, I don’t think he realizes that he’s talking over people… at least all the time. Sometimes we all jump in prematurely. We will work on this!
Chicken or egg? Mentioned in this weeks episode. This comparison always strikes me as odd since the chicken is a relatively recent construct of people. Should we be comparing something a bit further back in history? Although I guess a red jungle fowl could have laid an egg and a chicken came out the other side still leaving the question valid. 🙂
Love the show!
Haha! Totally fair point. Thank you for listening!
Hey Kirsten! I heard you might be looking for scientists to come on the show and wanted to self nominate myself! Feel free to twitter DM (@maddiehray) or email if you are ever looking for a Neuroscientist to come talk!
Hi Madelyn, send me an email, and let’s figure something out! –kiki
Hello!
I’d like to take this to introduce myself. My name is AJ Barton, Global Business Development w/ Nanowerk.com. Since 2005, the preeminent global small science & technology portal (2 million global users). Perhaps we can cross pollinate for mutual benefit as we are looking to create a podcast for our millions of global followers discussing the influence of small science and tech on everything and the future our world!
Best,
AJ
I used to be a long time listener but I chose to stop. I am on board with a lot of the feedback regarding your co-host. I don’t need to say much more but it has been a few years since I have listened to the show and came to check in to see if there were any changes. I will check back again in a few more years.
Sorry that we aren’t the kind of show that you enjoy. Thanks for giving us a try!
Your RSS feed is having problems. The RSS icon points to http://www.twis.org/feed which redirects to https://feeds.twis.org/twis/science/ which has returned a 404 error for over a week now (I’ve missed the last two episodes so far..)
Hi Marcus! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I noticed something was weird with it last week, but didn’t know if it was actually causing problems. I’m working to fix it. –kiki
Hi Marcus, I have an update!
I have updated the RSS icon to point to the correct feed address. Please, update your feed reader to use http://twis.org/feed/podcast. Thanks again for alerting me to the feed issues!
–kiki
Kirsten, loved the Scorpion’s association during the disappearing Mars dirt plug discussion (Justin and Blair are way too young to get it!).
Blair, ripe bananas are a LOT higher in glycemic content and index (especially the riper..) than papaya. Automatic go to for a small animal in my book!
Justin, hang in there. You’re outnumbered!
I’m glad SOMEONE gets my references. Thanks for the thought on glycemic index – that could actually make a big difference in the animals’ decisions.
Thank you for listening!
I am a longtime fan of TWIS, and listen to most episodes on an MP3 player. (I have donated in the past and am overdue to contribute again).
I am hearing impaired, and find the volume level of your podcast is uncomfortably low. Fortunately I found an app mp3gain that can increase the volume, though it takes a while. It shows roughly 85 db before processing, and I use the app to bump up the volume to 95 db. This works fine, but it would be great if the folks recording the podcast increased the volume about 10 db. Other podcasts (for example those on the TWIT network) are fine. TWIS has noticeably lower volume. I am sure many, many other folks have the same problem.Thanks, and keep up the good work! Tim
Thank you for the feedback, Tim. This is really helpful to know. We’ll see what we can do to make appropriate adjustments.
As I was listening to last weeks episode, I was reminded of a friend who moved from NY to FL and found that the medical care in FL was not as good as NY. He schedules his Dr appointments in NY when he comes back. My niece is studying to be a PA and the pay in NY is so much better that it is almost ridiculous to consider working anywhere else. So maybe this is another contributing factor to the red state/blue state discrepancy. The better doctors go to where they get paid better which is blue states.
Hello. Did I hear Blair on science Friday? If so I must say the microphone/studio they use provides a much better representation of her voice, it’s made me realize that “TWIS Blairs’ “microphone/studio is not doing her voice justice. I could however be wrong and the little piece which was not credited on the science Friday website was not Blair, but my senses say, that was Blair.